Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

v3.19.1
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2019
Notes to Financial Statements  
Note 13 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The Company has an arrangement with Premier Aftercare Recovery Service, (“PARS”). PARS is a Company controlled by Neil Muller, a shareholder of the Company and prior officer of the Company, that provided consulting services to the Company. There is no formal agreement between the parties and the amount of remuneration was $14,583 per month. During the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company incurred $-0- as consulting fees and expense reimbursements. As of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, there was an unpaid balance of $32,318.

 

The Company has an arrangement with Felix Financial Enterprises (“FFE”). FFE is a Company controlled by Lourdes Felix, an officer of the Company that provides consulting services to the Company. Until June 17, 2016, there was no formal agreement between the parties and the amount of remuneration is $14,583 per month. During the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company incurred $43,750 and $40,000, respectively, as consulting fees. As of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, there was an unpaid balance of $0.

 

The Company has an arrangement with Soupface LLC (“Soupface”). Soupface is a Company controlled by Brady Granier, an officer of the Company that provides consulting services to the Company. There was no formal agreement between the parties and the amount of remuneration is $14,583 per month. For the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company incurred $47,500 and $43,750, respectively, as consulting fees. As of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, there was an unpaid balance of $-0-.

 

The Company has an arrangement with Mr. Tom Welch, VP of Operations. Until June 17, 2016 there was no formal agreement between the parties and the amount of remuneration is $12,500 per month. For the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company incurred $37,500 and $35,000 respectively, as consulting fees. As of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, there was an unpaid balance of $-0-.

 

On July 28, 2016, the Company formed BioCorRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. for the purpose of developing certain business lines. In connection with the formation, the newly formed sub issued 24.2% ownership to current or former officers of the Company, with the Company retaining 75.8%. As of December 31, 2017, there were no significant transactions, assets or liabilities in BioCorRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc., or operations since its formation. During the year ended December 31, 2018, BioCorRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. began limited operations.

 

In March 2019, the Company entered into a Subscription and Royalty Agreement (the “Subscription and Royalty Agreement”), with Louis and Carolyn Lucido CRT LLC, managed by Mr. Louis Lucido, a member of the Board. Pursuant to the Subscription and Royalty Agreements: (i) Mr. Lucido would purchase shares of Common Stock in the aggregate amount of $3,000,000 at a purchase price of $15.00 per share (the “Purchase Price”), for a total of 200,000 shares of Common Stock; and (ii) the Company shall pay (a) a total of $37.50 from the gross revenue derived from each of its weight loss treatments sold in the United States starting on the first (1st) day that the first unit of the treatment is sold (the “Initial Sales Date”) and ending on the third (3rd) anniversary of the Initial Sales Date; and (b) a total of $25.00 from the gross revenue derived from each of its weight loss treatments sold in the United States starting on the day following the third (3rd) anniversary of the Initial Sales Date and ending on the fifteenth (15th) anniversary of the Initial Sales Date (the “Royalty”).

 

The above related parties are compensated as independent contractors and are subject to the Internal Revenue Service regulations and applicable state law guidelines regarding independent contractor classification. These regulations and guidelines are subject to judicial and agency interpretation, and it could be determined that the independent contractor classification is inapplicable.